The following information provides general insights on how
to write effective and competitive grant proposals, including common
pitfalls, hints for success, and working with a grant writer. This
information, along with information about the CIWMB grant
scoring criteria is provided to assist you in
writing effective and successful grant applications.
-
Chasing the money. Don’t write a grant to start a new project you don’t really need or want
just to bring funding ($$) into your agency.
-
Requesting money to offset a deficit. No one wants to fund your poor planning or agency
shortfall.
-
Going to Macy’s to buy groceries. Do your research first—make sure you’re going to the right
funder for the right project. Match-up is important.
-
Failing to understand it's a competitive process. Unless funding is a sure bet (e.g., based on
formula/entitlement), always assume demand is higher than supply.
-
Downloading the wrong grant application. Similar-sounding grant applications could be
issued simultaneously by the same funder. Or an out-of-date application might also still be on
the Web site.
-
Not reading the grant application thoroughly. Highlight the most important parts (like due
dates and required documents). Mark anything you don’t understand or where you need to find
answers.
-
Not reading the grant application early enough. Don’t delay—leaving yourself too little time
to make important contacts, gather important data, calculate costs accurately, find a grant
writer...can be disastrous!
-
Assuming the funder knows you/your agency. Even if you are the grant-award poster child,
don’t assume proposal readers will mentally fill in the missing
information. Don’t depend on
prior knowledge or past relationships.
-
Disregarding the funder’s questions. If it’s important to the funder, it’s important to you.
-
Philosophizing. Don’t argue with the funder’s assumptions. If you don’t agree with what
they’re interested in (or your ideas don’t match their requirements), you should probably find
another funder.
-
Being redundant. Saying it once is usually enough. Don’t add unnecessary “fill” or
“fluff.”
-
Reorganizing the proposal. Follow the format instructions and place items where the
funder has requested them—this is not the time to get creative with your presentation.
-
Being incomplete (including signatures). This could cost you points in scoring,
or it could
mean being considered nonresponsive and therefore disqualified.
-
Assuming it’s a one-person job. In most cases, no matter who writes the proposal or fills
out the application, collaboration or consultation with others will be
required.
-
Losing the Q & A window. Start reviewing the grant application requirements and writing
early enough to not let the time pass for asking questions and getting answers—and, don’t be
afraid to ask!
-
Using a former proposal without updating it. If you’re going to use it, at least shake off
all the dust. Use current dates, current numbers, current staff.
-
Using a proposal previously submitted to another funder. This is fair game, just be sure to
change the names to protect the innocent!
-
Not doing the math correctly. Use a calculator
or use Excel but make sure the numbers add up! Funders lose confidence when budgets or estimates aren’t accurate.
-
Poorly estimating real costs. Although budget line item transfers may be possible
after the grant award, think through ahead of time what labor, materials,
and overhead costs are expected to be.
-
Backing into the budget. Be realistic about what you need. Don’t create a budget that
reflects the maximum allowed just because the money’s there. Also, don’t expect staff to make
any cuts that may be needed.
-
Requesting nonqualifying expenses. Don’t sneak it in and hope no one notices! (Hint: even
if funded for it, auditors can catch these items after the grant award.)
-
Budget surprises. Don’t ask for items not described or mentioned in the
narrative.
-
“Going political.” Even with friends in high places, lobbying for points could
backfire or
blow up in your face.
-
Starting your project before getting the grant.
If the ink isn’t dry on the contract,
don’t assume it’s a done deal.
-
Write clearly and concisely—Succinctness is more important than volume.
-
Be thorough—What have you forgotten?
-
Be specific—Are the deliverables clear? Can the funder easily understand what they are
buying?
-
Follow the format—Be a “responsive”
applicant.
-
Use/create local data when possible—Define “data” as
information.
-
Address anticipated challenges—Don’t try to minimize them; describe how you will overcome
them.
-
Identify others necessary to your success—Who are the stakeholders?
How will you involve them?.
-
Use reader-friendly format—Grid display vs. narrative may say it
best.
-
Use good grammar. Use spell-check!
-
Bring something to the table—Funders view themselves as partners.
-
Write the executive summary after writing the proposal—It’s easier to put
together.
-
Make sure letters of support/letters of authorization mean something—They should state
exactly what collaborators will do and how their expertise will contribute to the
project.
-
Put yourself in the reader’s place—Would you know what the proposal was saying if you didn’t
write it? Would you want to fund this proposal?.